Supporting Learning Disabled And Lgbtqia Students

Isabelle Fryatt EIS 265 Dr. Castleman 02/15/15 Supporting Learning Disabled and LGBTQIA Students As a future teacher candidate, it is important to become as familiarized as possible with the various differences and experiences students may have within a single school or classroom. Having knowledge of other cultures, exceptionalities, and ethnic experiences will make understanding students’ views and perspectives easier and more comprehensive while also creating a safer and community-like atmosphere within the classroom. Students with learning disabilities (LD) are the largest groups of students with exceptionalities in the classroom today (â€Å"Fast Facts,’ 2013). LD students have held this ranking since the 1980’s. The numbers for the next leading group of exceptional students in the classroom (speech/language impaired students) are almost half that of LD students (â€Å"Fast Facts,’ 2013). Students with learning disabilities may not seem that different from their neurotypical peers. They may have trouble learning in some academic areas, even when provided highly effective instruction, but do fine in others (Fuchs, Fuchs, Mathes, Lipsey, and Roberts, 2002). The unevenness in their academic development is a main characteristic for LD students (Torgesen, 2002). Other typical characteristics that might be found include low achievement rates, easily distracted, lack of social skills, lack of motivation, and difficulty with information-processing (Rosenberg, 2011, p. 142). Of studentsShow MoreRelatedThe Values Of Hard Work, Family Unity, And Frugalness Have Shaped My Family1996 Words   |  8 Pages In the highlight film of my session, fellow student Sam Kahre expressed my own thoughts on the socialization I experienced while attending Summit. He said, â€Å"The only worldview I have known is Christianity and everything else is bad. That’s all I was ever taught really. So, it has been really interesting hearing other people’s perspectives† (Summit Ministries, 2016). I can relate to this quote because my chur ch, which is a source of personal learning, has barely addressed topics of diversity. I enjoyed

Does Not Happiness Ruin Happiness - 887 Words

Does Acknowledging Happiness Ruin Happiness? Since the days of Aristotle, happiness was thought to have at least two aspects: hedonia (pleasure) and eudaimonia (a life well lived). In contemporary psychology, happiness is referred to as simply pleasure and meaning. Positive psychologists, such as Dr. Martin Seligman, have recently added one more distinct component to the definition of happiness: engagement. As referred to in Seligman’s book, Authentic Happiness, engagement refers to living a â€Å"good life† of work, family, friends and hobbies (Seligman). Psychologists trying to understand what influences happiness and its meaning disagree on one concrete answer. A prevalent speculation made by psychologists is that a person terminates his or her happiness the moment he or she acknowledges their happiness. Due to the alterations of what physiologists think makes a person happy, and the questioning of a person’s happiness, a person cannot acknowledge the moment h e or she is happy without altering their happiness. In philosopher John Ralston Saul’s book, The Unconscious Civilization, he explains why what makes a person happy has changed, â€Å"As economic and social conditions have gradually spunk, happiness, with its twisted meaning at the ethical and legal Centre of our society, has seemed increasingly lugubrious and out of place† (Saul II). Saul further argues the desire of happiness today now speaks merely for materialistic comfort for one’s individual pleasure, hence changingShow MoreRelatedBrave New World Analysis737 Words   |  3 PagesBrave New World, happiness does not really exist. The government controls the environment and the minds of the people to make citizens happy. The World State and the World Controllers believe that happiness and truth are opposites and don’t work together, so they picked making the citizens happy instead of allowing them to know the truths. Huxley argues that we as a popula tion distract ourselves from the truth with technology and other means of diversion and that these things will ruin us. Neil PostmanRead MoreAnalysis Of Aristotle s Book II Of Nicomachean Ethics1391 Words   |  6 Pages In Aristotle’s Book II of Nicomachean Ethics, he states that virtue of character is how someone gets to the ultimate end, which is happiness. Aristotle states that, without a goal or ultimate end (happiness), life does not have a purpose. Therefore every action in a person’s life has to be made with true virtue of character in mind in order to achieve the final end. Aristotle states that virtue arises in us neither by nature nor against nature but since we are humans, by nature, we are able to acquireRead MoreEveryone Defines Happiness Differently, Everyone Enjoys1194 Words   |  5 PagesEveryone defines happiness differently, everyone enjoys different things but, we know happiness when we experience it. The phrase is used to describe a variety of positive feelings, including fulfillment, gratification, joy and appreciation. Happiness comes when we are pleased and contented. Happiness is a feeling of contentment that life is just as it should be. The right happiness, enlightenment, comes when you have all of your needs satisfied, because when we let ourselves be happy, it becomesRead MoreEssay on Review We Have No Right to Happiness713 Words   |  3 PagesReview on We have No â€Å"Right to Happiness† By: C.S. Lewis In class we read three different essays including ‘The Dying family’ by J.H. Plumb,’ Does Fatherhood Make You Happy?’ By Daniel Gilbert, and ‘We Have No Right to Happiness’ by C.S. Lewis. Though the purpose of these essays can be very controversial to some, after reviewing all three essays I have picked my favorite, or the one I agree with and disagree with most. ‘We have no Right to Happiness’ makes a very good argument on the pointRead MoreEntertainment Is Not Evil Essay examples911 Words   |  4 Pagespeople started with: art, music, wall paintings, and stories. Entertainment has been around for far too long to hold the capacity to ruin such a concept as a society. It at times may portray itself as necessities for life .People thrive upon the happiness and laughter caused by an amusing situation, and this entertainment fulfills such desire for people. Entertainment does not possess the capability to destroy society; in order for humanity to grow, relax and experience, individuals need to be open toRead More The Wanderer, From The Exeter Book Elegies1523 Words   |  7 Pageswanderer lives in now as he is now. Other than thinking of past people, the wanderer also talks about the ruins of what used to be buildings and how they have also â€Å"died†, much like everyone in his society (line 76-80). Eventually, he comes to the conclusion that everything ends. In other words, the wanderer concludes that life is transient. After the death of his friends and family, and seeing ruins where buildings used to lay, he makes the assumption that nothing in life lasts forever and it is inevitableRead MoreThe Ethical And Moral Issue945 Words   |  4 Pagesmost abundant species in North America. However, once they went extinct, the food chain and ecosystem began to not depend on their existence. Therefore, the question will be, what happen when we introduce there extinct species into wild? And does the happiness outweigh the risk? What might happen when introducing an alien species to an area? For the native species, these alien species are competitors for the resources. An example of invasive alien species is Water hyacinth, it was introduced to NorthRead MoreMonologue For An Onion By Suji Kwock Kim884 Words   |  4 Pagesrepresents her guarded heart broken into so many pieces that she does not even believe that it is there. Someone tries to love her, but in the end they both end up hurt. In â€Å"The Suitor† the suitor represents a woman who has finally found happiness and stability after many suitors have come and gone from her life. The two metaphors in each poem have meanings that are very similar. The onion represents her heart and the suitor represents happiness. Although they are different they both rely on each otherRead More Essay on Voltaire’s Candide: Relevance of Candide’s Message Today977 Words   |  4 Pagesphilosophical tale of one mans search for true happiness and his ultimate acceptance of lifes disappointments. Candide grows up in the Castle of Westfalia and is taught by the learned philosopher Dr. Pangloss. Candide is abruptly exiled from the castle when found kissing the Barons daughter, Cunegonde. Devastated by the separation from Cunegonde, his true love, Candide sets out to different places in the hope of finding her and achieving total happiness. The message of Candide is that one must striveRead MoreThe Desert Places by Robert Frost 782 Words   |  4 Pageshealth disorders. People have begun to appreciate money and fame more than their own happiness which is causing their life to be empty and meaningless. In the poem â€Å"The Desert Places† by Robert Frost the narrator encounters loneliness and isolation and talks about how it’s affecting his mental well-being negatively. The poem indicates that when individuals gets isolated from others, they compromise their own happiness as they receive the ill-effects of depression and failure to communicate their emotions

In My Short Life On This Planet I Have Come To Question Things That Ma Essay Example For Students

In My Short Life On This Planet I Have Come To Question Things That Ma Essay ny take upon blind faith. We all know that we must some day die; yet we continuously deny the forces at work inside ourselves, which want to search out the answers of what may or may not come after. It is far easier for humanity to accept that they will go to a safe haven and be rewarded for their lives with pleasures and fantasies of an unfathomable scale than to question the existence of a supposed omnipotent being. Yet, there are a few of us humans who tend to question the whys and wherefores that society puts forth to us. We question the existence of God, or the creation of mankind rather than blindly accepting faith-filled beliefs we may received from our parents as children. Perhaps it is because we live in a nation filled with many peoples of different beliefs whose Gods are all so varied and different that it is difficult to fathom that they are all the same divine being. It is also plausible that we just have a desire to quench the thirst for knowledge that lies deep within ourselves. As for myself, I cannot believe in a being which created a universe and a multitude of worlds in a rather short period of time then deigns to lower itself into becoming a puppet-master and pulling the strings of the Earth and all of the people therein. Since this paper touches upon many scientific terms, I feel that in order for the reader to correctly grasp the content I must first define three words: Theory, Law, and Hypothesis. The definitions will allow for a greater understanding of this essay and give us an even ground upon which to begin. Theory; (th?1e-r?, th?r1?) noun 1.a. Systematically organized knowledge applicable in a relatively wide variety of circumstances, especially a system of assumptions, accepted principles, and rules of procedure devised to analyze, predict, or otherwise explain the nature or behavior of a specified set of phenomena. b. Such knowledge or such a system. 2.An assumption based on limited information or knowledge; a conjecture. Law; (l?) noun 12.a. A formulation describing a relationship observed to be invariable between or among phenomena for all cases in which the specified conditions are met: the law of gravity. b. A generalization based on consistent experience or results: the law of supply and demand; the law of averages. Hypothesis; (h?-p?th1?-s?s) noun 1.A tentative explanation that accounts for a set of facts and can be tested by further investigation; a theory. 2.Something taken to be true for the purpose of argument or investigation; an assumption. It is important that you thoroughly read the above definitions or you will be at a disadvantage if you do not. You will note that there are several different definitions to each word. I felt it was important to include the added definitive statement to theory because it shows the difference between a scientific theory and an everyday theory based upon conjecture. The additional definitions to law and hypothesis are both added for a further understanding of thes e words. The definition of creationism is somewhat more complex. One must start by saying that the belief in the creation of the universe given at the beginning of the Bible is literally true. Creationism is a belief based solely upon faith (which is a belief in and of itself). There are no scientific facts as a basis for this belief, solely conjectural theories and speculations. It is ingrained into our minds, as children that a belief of a force, or supernatural entity, which is all powerful and all knowing, is watching over us and taking care of our needs. Yet, to me, saying this very sort of thing is heretical in its very essence. To be so crude as to think that some being which created the universe itself and all things in it would take the time to care for each and every individual is incomprehensible. In practically all ancient cultures, the biblical included, the universe was thought of as an original chaos into which order had been introduced by a creative hand: This was th e essence of creation.1 In this statement alone we can see one of the major flaws of creationism. While science can prove without doubt the universe up to the first 20 milliseconds of existence, we cannot prove anything before that point at this time. The statement above, regarding creationism, suggests that there was no beginning, only chaos. Subsequently this creative hand structured the order of the universe out of chaos and applied physical laws to that chaos so it would form itself into motion and order. Yet, creationism as a whole does not touch base upon what came before the chaos. While science admits that there was a time in which different laws and order applied; creationism attempts to deny this existence by saying that there was always something. For if there was indeed a beginning and there was no God before this time, where did God come from? We can scientifically prove that there was a beginning. We cannot yet ascertain what was before this beginning, but we now know that there was one. To suggest that the universe has always existed is a mere myth today. Much like the myth that the world was once flat. Today, we take for granted that the world is indeed round, for have we not seen pictures from the space shuttle in orbit of the earth. Not to mention the multitude of orbital shots from satellites. Consequently we would consider it preposterous if someone attempted to tell us that the world is a flat surface. Yet, upon blind faith, some are content to believe that a creative hand structured this existence. Although the figures (Gods) differ from mythos to mythos, all the ancient stories intend simply to give a poetic accounting for cosmic origins.2 In the scientific community there is a well known and accepted theory known as the Big Bang Theory. Most people know of this theory because they were taught it in school. Yet it usually contradicted what their parents and pastors taught them in church. As a result, the Big Bang Theory was generally dis carded as something that intellectual minds which cannot exist upon the true faith alone, must accept as truth. The Big Bang Theory is stated in condensed form as follows. As the universe expanded, the residual radiation from the big bang would continue to cool, until now it should be a temperature of about 3 K (about -270? C/-454? F). This relic radiation was detected by radio astronomy in 1965, thereby providing what most astronomers consider to be confirmation of the big bang theory.3 In this statement we have our first of arguments over creationism by evolution. We have the beginnings of a proof that there was a time or rather, I should say, a point in time where there was indeed nothing. Many creationists will argue that the universe is too ordered; the path of the planets (which meant wanderers, or great wanderers in early Grecian society) is too ordered, too perfect. I will start by asking you to attempt to define perfect (as it existed at that time). In the creationalistic p oint of view, a person might write it off as the act of God. It was his divine will that moved the planets together in such a way as to be able to support life. Or you could ask the more worldly scientist who would explain to you about the Law of Probability, the Theory of Relativity, and show you lengthy mathematical equations dealing with Quantum and Theoretical Physics. In the end, you would likely have a headache of immense size, but come away with perhaps a better understanding of how the order of events, and the laws which created, ordered and structured the planets to exist as they do. Many creationism fanatics will also attempt to dissuade the argument of evolution by saying that the Big Bang is merely a theory. The only reply that the scientific world can refute this with is the fact that relativity and gravity, are also theories. This argument by creationists is obviously not in their favor. The creation of the universe by scientific means is a world-wide theory that many creationists refute simply because it goes against their beliefs. Yet to understand evolution to its fullest, we must further investigate life, or rather human life. We ask questions like: How did we evolve from amoebae?Are you trying to tell me that I evolved from an ape? If we are evolving in such a manner as described, why can we not see it daily? Since these are all very good questions, I will touch base upon them all. Approximately seven-hundred or eight-hundred million years ago life was first known on this planet in the form of single-celled organisms called procaryotes, not amoebae. Over time these unicellular organisms diversified into an array of adaptive types. Scientists hypothesize that many advanced cells (eucaryotes) may have evolved through amalgamation of a number of distinct simple cell types. Single-celled eucaryotes then developed complex modes of living and advanced types of reproduction that led to the appearance of multicellular plants and animals. The latter are first known from about seven-hundred million years ago, and their appearance implies that at least moderate levels of free atmospheric oxygen and a relatively predictable supply of food plants had been achieved.4 Through a long and drawn out process life eventually formed into that of mammals and dinosaurs. However, approximately sixty-five million years ago the dinosaur specie was completely eradicated (perhaps by way of natural selection), which left only mammals. Approximately two million years ago humanity began to show its evolution in the order of the universe. Humans originally belonged to an order of mammals, the primates, which existed before the dinosaurs became extinct. This development of descending from tree habitats to forest floors and eventually to more open country was associated with the development of many unique features of the human primate, such as erect posture and reduced canine teeth, which suggests new habits of feeding. However, while humanity did evol ve from a primate ancestor, it did not evolve directly from an ape-like specie. Humans as well as apes both evolved from the same primate specie, but each branched in different directions to become apes in one specie and humans in another specie. Yet, you ask that if this is the case, and humanity has evolved from primates in such a short period of time, why can we not see the evolutionary process taking place today? The answer is a simple one. I know of no human which has lived for two-million years. Which in and of itself is not a very valid argument for this case, but nevertheless a substantial point at any rate. However, if we were to be more objective about the process of human evolution we would see that in the life span of the earth we are still a relatively young race. Dinosaurs, for example, inhabited this planet for over one-hundred-thirty-five million years. In relative view of this information, we can see that humans have only been in existence for approximately 1/60th o f the time that dinosaurs existed. With this in mind, we can further grasp that the process of evolution is a very slow process which requires an almost incomprehensible scale of time to our limited lifespans. While I realize that many points, and beliefs were not touched upon in this essay I did attempt to cover as much ground as possible in as short a space as possible. It is painfully clear to me that an existence based upon blind faith is no longer an acceptable tradition. The ideas of creationism are far outweighed by the Laws and Theories of evolution. While there are understandably a great many men who have spent a vast amount of time in scribing the Bible, we must realize that they were indeed men, not Gods and the bible is, actually, only a book. To believe the contents of that book completely, one must have unwavering faith in the validity of its concepts and the precepts upon which its religion is based. One of the striking and perhaps most intriguing points of interest t hat I have stumbled upon is the lack of education of creationism in schools. If the point was so very valid and without skeptical doubt, then why is it not being taught to our children? I understand the idea of separation between church and state, and the fact that the school is very much a part of state. Yet it seems to me that if the idea is a basic building block in todays society then why not teach this to the young? Why is it that we only teach evolution if it is so unbelievable? The simple fact of the matter is that we have evidence and supporting cases in science today which makes the very idea of creationism redundant to teach, as well as a contradicting view of evolution which could possibly confuse those of a younger age. There are many religions in the world upon which the bible are based, and the ones which espouse creationism are but a few. Being a western culture we tend to forget this. In summary I believe that evolution is the only plausible of these two theories whi ch is acceptable to the current state of humanity. In closing I leave you with a simple, yet disturbing statement that a great man once told me: it is not what you believe; its what you can prove.5 Creationism is based upon belief; evolution is based upon scientific proof. ___________________________ 1Creation, Microsoftr Encartar 96 Encyclopedia. c 1993-1995 Microsoft Corporation. All rights reserved. c Funk ; Wagnalls Corporation. All rights reserved. 2Creation, Microsoftr Encartar 96 Encyclopedia. c 1993-1995 Microsoft Corporation. All rights reserved. c Funk ; Wagnalls Corporation. All rights reserved. 3Cosmology, Microsoftr Encartar 96 Encyclopedia. c 1993-1995 Microsoft Corporation. All rights reserved. c Funk ; Wagnalls Corporation. All rights reserved. 4Evolution, Microsoftr Encartar 96 Encyclopedia. c 1993-1995 Microsoft Corporation. All rights reserved. c Funk ; Wagnalls Corporation. All rights reserved. 5 Personal Environmental Ethics Essay

Stephen King Wrote The Green Mile. The Green Mile Comes In Either The

Stephen King wrote The Green Mile. The Green Mile comes in either the series or one big book. There are six books in the series. The names are 1. The two dead girls. 2. The mouse on the mile. 3. Coffey's hands. 4. The bad death of Eduard Delacroix. 5. Night journey. 6. Coffey on the mile. The Green Mile is about a man named Paul Edgecombe writing a diary about his life on the mile. The Green Mile is about John Coffey's time during his stay on the mile. Coffey is in prison on death row for a crime he supposedly committed. The crime, killing two young and innocent girls. Coffey meets many people on the mile. One of them is Eduard Delacroix. Eduard Delacroix is French, and has made a friend named Mr. Jingles. Mr. Jingles was first named Steamboat Willy by the prison guards. John Coffey is a large man, even though he is scary looking and big he is very friendly. The book goes on about how a normal day on "The Mile" is. The novel is one of King's better works. Out of ten I rate The Green Mile a 9. After you start reading the novel it gets going and doesn't stop until the end of the book. Why read a long slow book when you can read The Green Mile?